- #Corel painter vs photoshop pro#
- #Corel painter vs photoshop software#
- #Corel painter vs photoshop free#
I did a lot of image processing for my job before I retired, and considered learning Gimp as part of a hobby.
#Corel painter vs photoshop software#
Gimp is an ideal program for a software engineer who wants to experiment with post-processing algorithms. It has layers, which is to my mind the minimum requirement for any post processing software. The things that make PaintShopPro "good enough" to my mind include that it supports many of the plug-ins you can use with Photoshop (I use the Topaz suite and FocusMagic, both of which are supported by Corel) it supports 16-bit-per-channel editing and its raw editor is usable, though clunky. In addition, its raw editor is the best third-party raw editor on the market. There are many tutorials and books about using it, and almost all the step-by-step ways of doing something assume that you are using Photoshop. The main thing that is better about Photoshop is its huge installed base. It is a decent program, but I normally suggest to others that they go with Photoshop if they are going to get seriously into post processing. I have also used PaintShopPro for many years.
#Corel painter vs photoshop free#
Gimp is simply stated best for people that do not have much dollars to be spent on photo editing as it is free and from what I have been able to learn just as powerful as the other two software packages that I have mentioned before, I may add Gimp to my software lab at home. The problem with Paintshop is that the new features are not as better thought out as Adobe's Photoshop is in my opinion.Ĭorel's After Shot tends to be the orphan child of Corel's offerings having little documentation written for the software unlike its big brother, however it much better suited for the advanced users. This does not force uses to lean multiple module to get one task done which can also be bad in that Adobe's separation allows users to use a divide and conquer method to learn to use the software. It's software Paintshop gets all of the editing done in one big module rather than the multiple module approach for Adobe. If you are like me then the creative cloud is not really a good idea as it costs more.Ĭorel, tends to play second fiddle to Adobe and is better for some and worse for others.
#Corel painter vs photoshop pro#
However there is a down side to Adobe: 1) the software uses multiple modules to get one task done, you open the photos in the organizer then move to the editor to get the editing done 2) There are several different Adobe software that edit photos and its rather confusing which to use and 3) Adobe is channeling its customers to renting software via the creative cloud, for some this is a better plan then others (if you are a pro and move around a lot taking your shots (personally I always return to my home PC for editing)).
This has some advantages, in my opinion, in that addition of new features and modifications to the software packages tend to get better thought out and better placed in the software as Adobe is a lot more visible and has a lot more to loose by not placing new features in the right place. Personally I think that Adobe is a better bet for individuals who like to work with the dominant software in the industry. Let me start out with the dominant, 80 pound gorilla in the market, Adobe. Personally I chose Corel and may work with Gimp as well and I believe there are some places where Corel's Photo Shop is a better choice the Photo Shop and there are instances where Photoshop is a better choice then Paint Shop.
I think that there is no one best photo editing software for all people and the major software package (Paint Shop, Photoshop or Gimp) that one chooses depends on what you feel is most important in a photo editing software.
0 kommentar(er)
